Is the written method always the right one in maths?

Right, welcome to year 3 children.. Maths time! Dienes? Place value counters? Bead bars? Pencil and paper is all you need in the juniors!

Do we race towards a written or mental because we know that eventually they won’t be able to use manipulatives in the SATS? Well yes, we do and if you say otherwise, you’re lying.

But does this give them number sense, fluency in number and the ability to ‘see’ numbers and what they represent? Or do they just learn the process akin to Charlie Bucket’s Dad screwing on toothpaste lids without a mere thought?

If someone tried to teach me French (dropped it at the end of year 9, massive regret. Should have continued through to GCSE), I know I would need a strong understanding of the language. A fluency and an ability to manipulate the words, to use them in different contexts. If someone tells me to regurgitate a sentence, that isn’t going to help in the long term.

A few weeks ago I, as Maths lead, was asked about a child in UKS2 doing some work on number bonds to 20 and was presented with a lovely Twinkl bar model sheet (no offence Twinkl, love your work) but was told that they were struggling with it… CPA.
C
P
A
Yes they should know them by now but they don’t so take it back. Big foam ten frames. Two of them stuck together. Numbers bonds to 20 in a concrete manner. I took the abstract sheet and binned it. More useful as a paper aeroplane.

We need to slow it down. The SATS sprint needs to stop. If you’re running through the countryside, you don’t see what you’re going past. If you slow to a walk, you take more in and appreciate what you can see. You understand it.

I teach a split year 1/2 class in a one form entry. In KS1 we ran a carousel system based around Maths and literacy. Monday/Wednesday for Maths. Tuesday/Thursday Literacy. Three groups. Three activities/problems/tasks. I, and my TA work with every child every day and we love it. It’s a logistical nightmare when I think about rolling it out to KS2 but that’s for a different blog.

So anyway, back to my point: Year 1 and 2 pupils can now confidently approach, quite often, the same task and explain how they will solve it. Concrete, pictorial or abstract.

If we get this in as soon as possible, it gets rid of the notion of a “top table” or the “the table that always has the TA at it” because we arm each child with the appropriate strategies to find the solution.

Yes, eventually each child will sit their SATS. It’s something we all know is coming but there are three years before that in KS2 where they could be missing out on things.

Tips:
1: Have resources in class, talk about them, model them, use their proper names.
2: Model your scaffolding in different ways – bar model, dienes, bead bar, written method,
3: Give children the choice and freedom of expression and accept that sometimes your more able will try to use a concrete method because of confidence issues.
4: Use written reasoning as a way of formative assessment. “I chose this method because…” Written reasoning gives so much more insight (especially with an independent task) and lets us see their thought process.

5. Use your working wall to full effect. CPA. Show them each way.

6. Follow your calculation policy and your progression towards written calculation. Children should progress through the stages but don’t afraid to drop back to the previous one or further. It shouldn’t dictate a year group.

7. If it does dictate a year group, get a new calculation policy.

Using a written method is the point we need to arrive at, but are the children simply learning, rather than understanding?

The author

Gavin Goulds

Gavin is currently a Maths leader in a one form-entry primary school in Lancashire, England and currently teaches a split year 1/2 class. He has a keen interest in Maths and is currently looking at ways to embed mastery teaching techniques in his school. He uses twitter regularly to share good practice and to work with other professionals.

https://mrgouldsiswingingthis.wordpress.com/